Meyerkorth v. Nebraska
372 U.S. 705, 83 S. Ct. 1018, 10 L. Ed. 2d 125, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1805
This text of 372 U.S. 705 (Meyerkorth v. Nebraska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Meyerkorth v. Nebraska, 372 U.S. 705, 83 S. Ct. 1018, 10 L. Ed. 2d 125, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1805 (1963).
Opinion
MEYERKORTH ET AL.
v.
NEBRASKA ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
James N. Ackerman for appellants.
Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, and Melvin K. Kammerlohr, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
372 U.S. 705, 83 S. Ct. 1018, 10 L. Ed. 2d 125, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyerkorth-v-nebraska-scotus-1963.