Meyer v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.
This text of 227 A.D. 818 (Meyer v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, as resettled, modified to the extent of vacating and setting aside the judgment entered May 10, 1929, of granting permission to Emma Meyer, as a beneficiary of the alleged agreement, but not as residuary legatee, to intervene as party plaintiff, and of directing that Eva C. Meyer, the widow, be made a party defendant. As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Whether or not these parties should be permitted to intervene rested in discretion (Brennan v. Hall, 131 N. Y. 160), which might be exercised either after or before execution of the judgment. (Matter of Ayrault, 81 Hun, 107; affd., 146 N. Y. 389.) While this court is reluctant to interfere with the Special Term in the exercise of discretion, it is of opinion that the order should be modified in the respects indicated in the interests of justice. Rich, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Young, J., dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 A.D. 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-title-guarantee-trust-co-nyappdiv-1929.