Meyer v. State

239 S.W. 949, 91 Tex. Crim. 496, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 265
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 12, 1922·No. No. 6887.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LATTIMORE, J.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Hunt county of the offense of possessing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

Since the adoption of the amendment to the Dean Law by the First Called Session of the Thirty-Seventh Legislature (Vernon’s Ann. Pen. Code Supp. 1922, art. 588¼ et seq.), the offense of possessing intoxicating liquor has been so changed as that it is no longer a violation of the law to possess same, except when had for purposes of sale. We have uniformly held that it is necessary that the indictment contain an allegation that such possession is for the purpose of sale.

There being no such charge in the instant case, the indictment is fatally defective, and it becomes necessary to order a reversal, and that the prosecution be dismissed, which is accordingly done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meyer v. State, 239 S.W. 949, 91 Tex. Crim. 496, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 265 (Tex. 1922).

239 S.W. 949 (Meyer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gandy v. State
268 S.W. 951 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)