Meyer v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Meyer v. State

94 S.E. 839, 21 Ga. App. 670, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 469

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 22, 1918

Docket9350

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 839 (Meyer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer v. State, 94 S.E. 839, 21 Ga. App. 670, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 469 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Harwell, J.

The uneontradicted testimony of the State’s witness showed that a search of the defendant’s residence was made and a quantity of whisky found therein. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, no [671]*671error of law is complained of, 'and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Decided January 22, 1918.

Indictment for misdemeanor; from city court of Savannah— Judge Bourke. September 29, 1917.

Robert L. Golding, for plaintiff in error. Walter G. Hartridge, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI