Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Meyer v. Sherwood Automobile Corp.

Meyer v. Sherwood Automobile Corp.

123 Misc. 923, 206 N.Y.S. 645, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1237
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 11, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 Misc. 923 (Meyer v. Sherwood Automobile Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyer v. Sherwood Automobile Corp., 123 Misc. 923, 206 N.Y.S. 645, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1237 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The chattel having been sold under the judgment in the replevin action without notice to the conditional vendee as prescribed in section 66 of the Personal Property Law (Laws of 1909, chap. 45), the vendor is liable in accordance with section [924]*92465 of that statute, and it was unnecessary to prove the vendee’s damages.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Guy, Bijur and Mullan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Angelus
150 P.2d 908 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 Misc. 923, 206 N.Y.S. 645, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-sherwood-automobile-corp-nyappterm-1924.