Meyer v. Scutieri

539 So. 2d 602, 1989 WL 21453
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 14, 1989
Docket88-654
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 539 So. 2d 602 (Meyer v. Scutieri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyer v. Scutieri, 539 So. 2d 602, 1989 WL 21453 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

539 So.2d 602 (1989)

Mortimer MEYER, Rodney R. Young, Jr., George Jack, Doris S. Brown, Eleanor Bruce Milton Simon and Samuel Miller, Appellants,
v.
Philip J. SCUTIERI, Jr., Joan Adubato, Frank Adubato, Joan Warger, Albert Perez, Pan American Bank, N.A., As Trustee and Sunrise Point, Inc., Appellees.

No. 88-654.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 14, 1989.

*603 Friedman, Baur, Miller & Webner and Dale Webner, Miami, for appellants.

Hal S. Vogel, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by Mortimer Meyer and certain other condominium unit owners at Sunrise Point Condominium from an adverse trial court order which denied their motion to vacate, in part, an attorney's fees order insofar as it awarded attorney's fees not only against Sunrise Point Condominium Association, Inc., the losing plaintiff in a suit brought below against the appellees herein, but also against "each of the members of the class it represents, jointly and severally... ." Appellants sought to vacate the quoted portion of the attorney's fee order under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540. We reverse the order appealed from upon a holding that the trial court had no jurisdiction in this unsuccessful class action suit to enter an attorney's fee award against every member of the subject class, jointly and severally. This is so because (a) the final judgment was entered solely against Sunrise Point Condominium Association, Inc., which was sole plaintiff in the last operative complaint in this case, and (b) an attorney's fee award may only be entered, where appropriate, against the losing party to the lawsuit and cannot be entered, as here, against non-parties. See Johnson v. Schneegold, 419 So.2d 684, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Dade County v. Grossman, 354 So.2d 131, 132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

The order under review is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions (1) to grant the appellants' motion to vacate, and (2) to allow the plaintiff Sunrise Point Condominium Association, Inc. to assess each class member a pro rata share of the subject attorney's fee award in accordance with the Florida Condominium Statute. §§ 718.115(2), 718.119(1), Fla. Stat. (1987).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Addison v. City of Tampa
33 So. 3d 742 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Amber Glades, Inc. v. LEISURE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
893 So. 2d 620 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Pardo v. Decoplage Condominium Ass'n
833 So. 2d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
PYSZKA, KESSLER v. Mullin
602 So. 2d 956 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 So. 2d 602, 1989 WL 21453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-scutieri-fladistctapp-1989.