Meyer v. Royalton Oil Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Meyer v. Royalton Oil Company

208 N.W. 645, 167 Minn. 515, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1368

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 23, 1926

DocketNo. 25,165.

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 208 N.W. 645 (Meyer v. Royalton Oil Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer v. Royalton Oil Company, 208 N.W. 645, 167 Minn. 515, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1368 (Mich. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari to review the order of the Industrial Commission awarding to Herman J. Meyer compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law for injuries sustained in a collision with a freight train. The defense urged is that Meyer was not engaged in the business of his employers at the time of the accident.

The employers were engaged in the gasolene and oil business at Royal-ton, and employed Meyer to drive a truck and to deliver gasolene and oil to their customers in the territory adjacent to that village. It was also a part of his duties to get new business and new customers and to collect for sales previously made. He did not follow a regular route nor have fixed hours for work, but was allowed to vary his trips according to his own judgment. On the day of the accident he left Royalton about 11 o’clock and drove to Bowlus, then through the township of Swan River, and then to Little Falls where he arrived about 5 o’clock. At Little Falls he went to see the proprietor of a garage in an effort to secure a new *516 customer, and then went to the home of a friend, Frank Brodkorb, to whom he had previously sold some gasolene. He says he went there to collect the bill. Brodkorb was away. He had supper with the family and waited until Brodkorb’s return which was about 8 o’clock. They visited until about 9 o’clock when he started with the truck for Royalton. About two miles out from Little Falls he collided with a freight train which was on a sidetrack extending across the highway. His injuries were serious.

The employers insist that his visit at Brodkorb’s was outside his duties , and for his own pleasure, and relieved them from liability for the injuries sustained in the accident. It was concededly his duty to take the truck to Royalton and he had no fixed time for doing so. He sustained his injuries while performing that duty, and we think the commission correctly held that he was within the protection of the compensation act.

Award affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari to review the order of the Industrial Commission awarding to Herman J. Meyer compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law for injuries sustained in a collision with a freight train. The defense urged is that Meyer was not engaged in the business of his employers at the time of the accident.

The employers were engaged in the gasolene and oil business at Royal-ton, and employed Meyer to drive a truck and to deliver gasolene and oil to their customers in the territory adjacent to that village. It was also a part of his duties to get new business and new customers and to collect for sales previously made. He did not follow a regular route nor have fixed hours for work, but was allowed to vary his trips according to his own judgment. On the day of the accident he left Royalton about 11 o’clock and drove to Bowlus, then through the township of Swan River, and then to Little Falls where he arrived about 5 o’clock. At Little Falls he went to see the proprietor of a garage in an effort to secure a new *516 customer, and then went to the home of a friend, Frank Brodkorb, to whom he had previously sold some gasolene. He says he went there to collect the bill. Brodkorb was away. He had supper with the family and waited until Brodkorb’s return which was about 8 o’clock. They visited until about 9 o’clock when he started with the truck for Royalton. About two miles out from Little Falls he collided with a freight train which was on a sidetrack extending across the highway. His injuries were serious.

The employers insist that his visit at Brodkorb’s was outside his duties , and for his own pleasure, and relieved them from liability for the injuries sustained in the accident. It was concededly his duty to take the truck to Royalton and he had no fixed time for doing so. He sustained his injuries while performing that duty, and we think the commission correctly held that he was within the protection of the compensation act.

Award affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 N.W. 645, 167 Minn. 515, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-royalton-oil-company-minn-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack