Meyer v. Rothenberg
722 N.W.2d 879, 477 Mich. 918
This text of 722 N.W.2d 879 (Meyer v. Rothenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Meyer v. Rothenberg, 722 N.W.2d 879, 477 Mich. 918 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Jacqueline MEYER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Martin Meyer, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David J. ROTHENBERG, D.O., and Botsford Primary Care Physicians, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 7, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
722 N.W.2d 879, 477 Mich. 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-rothenberg-mich-2006.