Meyer v. Riordan

City of New York Municipal Court

Meyer v. Riordan

64 N.Y.S. 382

DecidedMay 1, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 64 N.Y.S. 382 (Meyer v. Riordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer v. Riordan, 64 N.Y.S. 382 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

If the appellant was dissatisfied with the statement made by the trial justice to the jury, he should have requested him to charge that there was no evidence pro or con upon the facts concerning which the jury wished to be instructed. Appellant’s mere exception to the instruction given we think was not sufficient. Quill v. Railroad Co. (Com. P1.) 11 N. Y. Supp. 80; Mallory v. Railroad Co., 3 Abb. Dec. 139.

Judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

If the appellant was dissatisfied with the statement made by the trial justice to the jury, he should have requested him to charge that there was no evidence pro or con upon the facts concerning which the jury wished to be instructed. Appellant’s mere exception to the instruction given we think was not sufficient. Quill v. Railroad Co. (Com. P1.) 11 N. Y. Supp. 80; Mallory v. Railroad Co., 3 Abb. Dec. 139.

Judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 N.Y.S. 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-riordan-nynyccityct-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack