Meyer v. Riordan

City of New York Municipal Court

Meyer v. Riordan

31 Misc. 828

City of New York Municipal Court·Decided May 15, 1900·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

If the appellant was dissatisfied with the statement made by the trial justice to the jury, he should have requested him to charge that there was no evidence pro or con upon the fact concerning which the jury wished to be instructed. Appellant’s mere exception to the instruction given, we think, was not sufficient. 32 N. Y. St. Repr. 612; 3 Abb. Ct. App. Dec. 139.

Judgment is. affirmed, with costs. '

Present: Fitzsimohs, Oh. J., Cqelae and O’Dwyer, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

If the appellant was dissatisfied with the statement made by the trial justice to the jury, he should have requested him to charge that there was no evidence pro or con upon the fact concerning which the jury wished to be instructed. Appellant’s mere exception to the instruction given, we think, was not sufficient. 32 N. Y. St. Repr. 612; 3 Abb. Ct. App. Dec. 139.

Judgment is. affirmed, with costs. '

Present: Fitzsimohs, Oh. J., Cqelae and O’Dwyer, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Meyer v. Riordan, 31 Misc. 828 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Pincite

31 Misc. 828 (Meyer v. Riordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related