Meyer v. R. B. White Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Meyer v. R. B. White Lumber Co.

117 So. 718, 96 Fla. 143

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 7, 1928·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, there *144 fore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Loftin, Blokes and Calkinsi, Attorneys for Appellants; Clark, Clark & Johnson, Attorneys for Appellee. Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, there *144 fore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Loftin, Blokes and Calkinsi, Attorneys for Appellants; Clark, Clark & Johnson, Attorneys for Appellee. Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur:

Meyer v. R. B. White Lumber Co., 117 So. 718, 96 Fla. 143 (Fla. 1928).

Pincite

117 So. 718 (Meyer v. R. B. White Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related