Meyer v. Powell

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Meyer v. Powell

25 Misc. 785, 55 N.Y.S. 574

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Misc. 785 (Meyer v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer v. Powell, 25 Misc. 785, 55 N.Y.S. 574 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There was evidence enough in this case to support a conclusion that the note in question was indorsed by the defendant for the purpose of giving credit to the maker with the payee, and that the maker received the amount of the note from the payee after such indorsement had been made. It is true that there was some conflict in the evidence, but it was the function of the trial justice to resolve this, and, he having found in favor of the plaintiff, we do not think that we would be justified in reversing his action. ' The facts having been found for the plaintiff, judgment in his favor necessarily followed. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Beekmaw, P. J., Gildebsleeve and Giegebich, JJ.

Judgment, affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There was evidence enough in this case to support a conclusion that the note in question was indorsed by the defendant for the purpose of giving credit to the maker with the payee, and that the maker received the amount of the note from the payee after such indorsement had been made. It is true that there was some conflict in the evidence, but it was the function of the trial justice to resolve this, and, he having found in favor of the plaintiff, we do not think that we would be justified in reversing his action. ' The facts having been found for the plaintiff, judgment in his favor necessarily followed. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Beekmaw, P. J., Gildebsleeve and Giegebich, JJ.

Judgment, affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Misc. 785, 55 N.Y.S. 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-powell-nyappterm-1899.