Meyer v. New York

Second Circuit

Meyer v. New York

463 F.2d 424

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 17, 1972·No. No. 622, Docket 71-1794·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On March 5, 1971, the appellant filed a prolix and nearly incomprehensible complaint in the Southern District of New York. On April 22, 1971, the State of New York moved, pursuant to F.R. Civ.P. 12(b), to dismiss the complaint for (1) lack of jurisdiction and (2) failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. On May 3, 1971, Judge Palmieri granted the State’s motion and dismissed the complaint, 344 F.Supp. 1377.

While we recognize that appellant feels deeply aggrieved, we affirm substantially for the reasons given in Judge Palmieri’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On March 5, 1971, the appellant filed a prolix and nearly incomprehensible complaint in the Southern District of New York. On April 22, 1971, the State of New York moved, pursuant to F.R. Civ.P. 12(b), to dismiss the complaint for (1) lack of jurisdiction and (2) failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. On May 3, 1971, Judge Palmieri granted the State’s motion and dismissed the complaint, 344 F.Supp. 1377.

While we recognize that appellant feels deeply aggrieved, we affirm substantially for the reasons given in Judge Palmieri’s opinion.

Meyer v. New York, 463 F.2d 424 (2d Cir. 1972).

Pincite

463 F.2d 424 (Meyer v. New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related