Meyer v. New York

Second Circuit

Meyer v. New York

463 F.2d 424

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 17, 1972

DocketNo. 622, Docket 71-1794

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 463 F.2d 424 (Meyer v. New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer v. New York, 463 F.2d 424 (2d Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On March 5, 1971, the appellant filed a prolix and nearly incomprehensible complaint in the Southern District of New York. On April 22, 1971, the State of New York moved, pursuant to F.R. Civ.P. 12(b), to dismiss the complaint for (1) lack of jurisdiction and (2) failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. On May 3, 1971, Judge Palmieri granted the State’s motion and dismissed the complaint, 344 F.Supp. 1377.

While we recognize that appellant feels deeply aggrieved, we affirm substantially for the reasons given in Judge Palmieri’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On March 5, 1971, the appellant filed a prolix and nearly incomprehensible complaint in the Southern District of New York. On April 22, 1971, the State of New York moved, pursuant to F.R. Civ.P. 12(b), to dismiss the complaint for (1) lack of jurisdiction and (2) failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. On May 3, 1971, Judge Palmieri granted the State’s motion and dismissed the complaint, 344 F.Supp. 1377.

While we recognize that appellant feels deeply aggrieved, we affirm substantially for the reasons given in Judge Palmieri’s opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

463 F.2d 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-new-york-ca2-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack