Meyer v. Milliken

Supreme Court of Colorado

Meyer v. Milliken

111 P.2d 232, 107 Colo. 295, 1941 Colo. LEXIS 286

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedMarch 3, 1941

DocketNo. 14,534.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 111 P.2d 232 (Meyer v. Milliken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer v. Milliken, 111 P.2d 232, 107 Colo. 295, 1941 Colo. LEXIS 286 (Colo. 1941).

Pincite

Opinions

JUDGMENT of affirmance heretofore entered herein,Meyer v. Milliken, 105 Colo. 532, 100 P.2d 151, vacated and the judgment of the district court reversed en banc without written opinion, pursuant to mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States now on file. See Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. ___ 61 Sup. Ct. 339,85 L.Ed. 269. The defendants in error to have judgment for their costs herein expended, including that of the cost of the supplemental abstract.

MR. JUSTICE KNOUS and MR. JUSTICE HILLIARD dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT of affirmance heretofore entered herein,Meyer v. Milliken, 105 Colo. 532, 100 P.2d 151, vacated and the judgment of the district court reversed en banc without written opinion, pursuant to mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States now on file. See Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. ___ 61 Sup. Ct. 339,85 L.Ed. 269. The defendants in error to have judgment for their costs herein expended, including that of the cost of the supplemental abstract.

MR. JUSTICE KNOUS and MR. JUSTICE HILLIARD dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 P.2d 232, 107 Colo. 295, 1941 Colo. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-milliken-colo-1941.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack