Meyer v. Meyer

130 Misc. 719, 224 N.Y.S. 337, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1111
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 14, 1927
StatusPublished

This text of 130 Misc. 719 (Meyer v. Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyer v. Meyer, 130 Misc. 719, 224 N.Y.S. 337, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1111 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1927).

Opinion

Franicenthaler, J.

Motion to dismiss complaint is granted, without costs, with leave to serve an amended complaint within ten days. The complaint should affirmatively allege facts showing that plaintiff is legally entitled, under the National Prohibition Act; to the possession of the liquor for the detention of which this action is brought. (Lundy v. Orr, 205 App. Div. 296; Lennox v. Meehan, 121 Misc. 678, 680; Nat. Prohibition Act [41 U. S. Stat. at Large, 317, § 33; U. S. Code, tit. 27, § 50]; Gonch v. Republic Storage Co., Inc., 245 N. Y. 272.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonch v. Republic Storage Co., Inc.
157 N.E. 136 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)
Lundy v. Orr
205 A.D. 296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)
Lennox v. Meehan
121 Misc. 678 (New York Supreme Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 Misc. 719, 224 N.Y.S. 337, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-meyer-nysupct-1927.