Meyer v. Meyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meyer v. Meyer

50 A.D.2d 864, 377 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11742

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 864 (Meyer v. Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer v. Meyer, 50 A.D.2d 864, 377 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11742 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In action in which the plaintiff husband was granted a divorce by a [865]*865judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 26, 1974, he appeals from so much of the judgment as awarded defendant custody of the parties’ child, David E. Meyer, until the child attains the age of 16 years, with leave to either party to apply to the court at the end of that period for custody. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. From the record on this appeal, it is clear that both parties were fit and loving parents and that custody could have properly been awarded to either of them. Upon the facts before us, we find no basis for disturbing the discretionary award of custody by Special Term to defendant. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In action in which the plaintiff husband was granted a divorce by a [865]*865judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 26, 1974, he appeals from so much of the judgment as awarded defendant custody of the parties’ child, David E. Meyer, until the child attains the age of 16 years, with leave to either party to apply to the court at the end of that period for custody. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. From the record on this appeal, it is clear that both parties were fit and loving parents and that custody could have properly been awarded to either of them. Upon the facts before us, we find no basis for disturbing the discretionary award of custody by Special Term to defendant. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 864, 377 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-meyer-nyappdiv-1975.