Meyer v. McKenna

246 A.D. 783

Opinion

In an action brought to foreclose a mortgage where the defense interposed was that the mortgage was usurious in its inception and the court sustained such contention and held the mortgage void and directed its cancellation, judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meyer v. McKenna, 246 A.D. 783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

246 A.D. 783 (Meyer v. McKenna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.