Meyer v. McKenna
This text of 246 A.D. 783 (Meyer v. McKenna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action brought to foreclose a mortgage where the defense interposed was that the mortgage was usurious in its inception and the court sustained such contention and held the mortgage void and directed its cancellation, judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-mckenna-nyappdiv-1935.