Meyer v. Martin

635 So. 2d 984, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3431, 1994 WL 124475
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 13, 1994
DocketNos. 92-2583, 93-0737
StatusPublished

This text of 635 So. 2d 984 (Meyer v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyer v. Martin, 635 So. 2d 984, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3431, 1994 WL 124475 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We sua sponte consolidate these appeals and reverse and remand for entry of judgment in favor of appellant. We agree with the appellant that the trial court’s construction of the contract in question would render the contract unenforceable as a matter of law. See Pick Kwik Food Stores, Inc. v. Tenser, 407 So.2d 216 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) (where one party has unrestricted right to terminate a contract at any time, contract is void for lack of mutuality of obligation), rev. denied, 415 So.2d 1361 (Fla.1982); also see Wright & Seaton, Inc. v. Prescott, 420 So.2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pick Kwik Food Stores, Inc. v. Tenser
407 So. 2d 216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Wright & Seaton, Inc. v. Prescott
420 So. 2d 623 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
635 So. 2d 984, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3431, 1994 WL 124475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-martin-fladistctapp-1994.