Meyer v. Martin
This text of 635 So. 2d 984 (Meyer v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We sua sponte consolidate these appeals and reverse and remand for entry of judgment in favor of appellant. We agree with the appellant that the trial court’s construction of the contract in question would render the contract unenforceable as a matter of law. See Pick Kwik Food Stores, Inc. v. Tenser, 407 So.2d 216 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) (where one party has unrestricted right to terminate a contract at any time, contract is void for lack of mutuality of obligation), rev. denied, 415 So.2d 1361 (Fla.1982); also see Wright & Seaton, Inc. v. Prescott, 420 So.2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
635 So. 2d 984, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3431, 1994 WL 124475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-martin-fladistctapp-1994.