Meyer v. Kalkmann

6 Cal. 582
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 Cal. 582 (Meyer v. Kalkmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyer v. Kalkmann, 6 Cal. 582 (Cal. 1856).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt.

Mr. Chief Justice Murray and Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

The Legislature, in creating the Superior Court of the city of San Francisco, acted under power given it in the Constitution, “ to establish such municipal and other inferior Courts as may be deemed necessary.”

[590]*590From the expression of this clause, taken together with the constitutional distribution of judicial power, the Courts to be created could only be of inferior, limited and special jurisdiction.

The jurisdiction of a municipal Court must necessarily he confined to the municipal territory for which it was especially created, and the Legislature has no power to extend its jurisdiction, so as to let its process run beyond its territory.

The Act giving such power to the Superior Court, is therefore invalid.

The order made against the appellant is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Krofcheck v. Ensign Co.
112 Cal. App. 3d 558 (California Court of Appeal, 1980)
Courtwright v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.
30 Cal. 573 (California Supreme Court, 1866)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Cal. 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-kalkmann-cal-1856.