Meyer v. Humaydan

96 A.D.2d 743, 465 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19332
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 11, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 743 (Meyer v. Humaydan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyer v. Humaydan, 96 A.D.2d 743, 465 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19332 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed, with costs, motion denied and petitioner’s petition reinstated. Memorandum: Family Court erred in vacating its prior approval of an agreement in which respondent admitted paternity and agreed to pay child support. Since petitioner and her child resided in Fargo, North Dakota, at the time the approval was requested, the notice requirement of subdivision (b) of section 516 of the Family Court Act has no extraterritorial effect (see McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes, § 149). (Appeal from order of Monroe County Family Court, Corbett, J. — paternity agreement.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MOTOR VEHICLE MFRS. ASS'N OF US, INC. v. Abrams
720 F. Supp. 284 (S.D. New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A.D.2d 743, 465 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-humaydan-nyappdiv-1983.