Meyer v. Humaydan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meyer v. Humaydan

96 A.D.2d 743, 465 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19332

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 11, 1983·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed, with costs, motion denied and petitioner’s petition reinstated. Memorandum: Family Court erred in vacating its prior approval of an agreement in which respondent admitted paternity and agreed to pay child support. Since petitioner and her child resided in Fargo, North Dakota, at the time the approval was requested, the notice requirement of subdivision (b) of section 516 of the Family Court Act has no extraterritorial effect (see McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes, § 149). (Appeal from order of Monroe County Family Court, Corbett, J. — paternity agreement.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously reversed, with costs, motion denied and petitioner’s petition reinstated. Memorandum: Family Court erred in vacating its prior approval of an agreement in which respondent admitted paternity and agreed to pay child support. Since petitioner and her child resided in Fargo, North Dakota, at the time the approval was requested, the notice requirement of subdivision (b) of section 516 of the Family Court Act has no extraterritorial effect (see McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes, § 149). (Appeal from order of Monroe County Family Court, Corbett, J. — paternity agreement.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.

Meyer v. Humaydan, 96 A.D.2d 743, 465 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19332 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

96 A.D.2d 743 (Meyer v. Humaydan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related