Meyer v. Helland

2 Colo. App. 209
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 15, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Colo. App. 209 (Meyer v. Helland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyer v. Helland, 2 Colo. App. 209 (Colo. Ct. App. 1892).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In a primitive way the abstract of record in this case informs us that a summons was issued by a justice of the peace, and returned showing service. Beyond this the abstract is wholly insufficient and in no sense complies with rule 16 of the supreme court of the state of Colorado [210]*210and of this court. It does not contain a brief statement of the contents of the pleadings, nor set forth the points of the pleadings or evidence and the points relied upon for the reversal of the judgment or decree. We are, therefore, under the necessity of dismissing the appeal for failure to prosecute and present the same as provided by statute and the rules of the court.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Colo. App. 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-helland-coloctapp-1892.