Meyer v. Gorham

California Supreme Court

Meyer v. Gorham

11 Cal. 392

DecidedJuly 1, 1858

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Cal. 392 (Meyer v. Gorham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer v. Gorham, 11 Cal. 392 (Cal. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—

Terry, C. J., concurring.

The plaintiff recovered judgment below, in trespass, for the levy by the defendant as Sheriff, of certain personal property of which plaintiff had possession by virtue of a chattel mortgage executed by Mitchell and Nunes to him.

The case is presented under a totally different state of facts from that shown by the record when the case was before this Court heretofore.

There is no error in the record, and judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—

Terry, C. J., concurring.

The plaintiff recovered judgment below, in trespass, for the levy by the defendant as Sheriff, of certain personal property of which plaintiff had possession by virtue of a chattel mortgage executed by Mitchell and Nunes to him.

The case is presented under a totally different state of facts from that shown by the record when the case was before this Court heretofore.

There is no error in the record, and judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Cal. 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-gorham-cal-1858.