Meyer v. Gas Magazines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meyer v. Gas Magazines, Inc.

49 A.D.2d 864, 374 N.Y.S.2d 322, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11048

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 864 (Meyer v. Gas Magazines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer v. Gas Magazines, Inc., 49 A.D.2d 864, 374 N.Y.S.2d 322, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11048 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered January 16, 1975, in the Supreme Court, New York County, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $60 costs and disbursements to respondent. Clearly the court had no in personam jurisdiction of defendant (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 8), since there was no evidence that defendant transacted any business within the State (CPLR 302, subd [a], par 1) or indeed committed any other acts which might form a basis for jurisdiction under CPLR 302. The occasional visits of certain officers of defendant to New York, which, for the most part, were for plaintiffs benefit, were not for the purpose of transacting business in the State. Moreover, all contracts could only be formalized in Madison, Wisconsin. Certainly, if such officers were transacting business here, there would have been no reason to pay plaintiff the commissions which he received as a result of their visits. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered January 16, 1975, in the Supreme Court, New York County, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $60 costs and disbursements to respondent. Clearly the court had no in personam jurisdiction of defendant (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 8), since there was no evidence that defendant transacted any business within the State (CPLR 302, subd [a], par 1) or indeed committed any other acts which might form a basis for jurisdiction under CPLR 302. The occasional visits of certain officers of defendant to New York, which, for the most part, were for plaintiffs benefit, were not for the purpose of transacting business in the State. Moreover, all contracts could only be formalized in Madison, Wisconsin. Certainly, if such officers were transacting business here, there would have been no reason to pay plaintiff the commissions which he received as a result of their visits. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 864, 374 N.Y.S.2d 322, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-gas-magazines-inc-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack