Meyer v. Flood

4 P.2d 305, 54 Nev. 55, 1931 Nev. LEXIS 49
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided November 2, 1931·No. 2927·Published

Opinion

By the Court,

Sanders, J.:

On behalf of the respondents, it is claimed on their motion to dismiss this appeal that at the time it was taken no final judgment had been rendered, and that therefore the appeal was premature, and should be dismissed.

A judgment is the final determination of the rights of the parties in the action or proceeding. Section 8794, N. C. L. 1929. A decision duly pronounced which finally determines. and disposes of the action or proceeding is appealable. Nev. First Nat. Bank of Tonopah v. Lamb, 51 Nev. 162, 271 P. 691; Perkins v. Sierra Nev. S. M. Co., 10 Nev. 405; Calif. State Telegraph Co. v. Patterson, 1 Nev. 150. In Perkins v. Sierra Nev. S. M. Co., supra, it was held that a judgment is none the less final *56 because some future orders of the court may become necessary to carry it into effect.

The record discloses that the decision in the instant case was duly pronounced and finally disposed of the proceeding, in so far as it respects appellants and respondents as conflicting claimants under the will of James C. Dunphy, deceased.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meyer v. Flood, 4 P.2d 305, 54 Nev. 55, 1931 Nev. LEXIS 49 (Neb. 1931).

4 P.2d 305 (Meyer v. Flood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nevada First National Bank v. Lamb
271 P. 691 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1928)
California State Telegraph Co. v. Patterson
1 Nev. 150 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1865)
Perkins v. Sierra Nevada Silver Mining Co.
10 Nev. 405 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1876)