Meyer v. Farmers State Bank

103 N.E. 97, 180 Ind. 483, 1913 Ind. LEXIS 139
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 21, 1913
DocketNo. 22,519
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 103 N.E. 97 (Meyer v. Farmers State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyer v. Farmers State Bank, 103 N.E. 97, 180 Ind. 483, 1913 Ind. LEXIS 139 (Ind. 1913).

Opinion

Spencer, C. J.

Appellee instituted this proceeding in the Dubois Circuit Court to have reviewed the action of appellants, constituting the board of finance of Harbison Township, Dubois County, Indiana, in refusing to approve the bond tendered by appellee with its application to become a depository for the funds of said township for the years 1911 and 1912. The circuit court, after hearing the evidence, approved said bond and created appellee a public depository for the funds of Harbison Township, in a sum not to exceed $2,000. This appeal follows.

1.

The assignment of errors herein was filed on August 31, 1911. No motion to advance the cause appears to have been made and pending its disposition on appeal the term for which appellee was made a depository has [484]*484expired. Consequently, the appeal must be dismissed, as it presents nothing but moot questions, which the courts never decide, and cannot be entertained simply to determine a question of costs. Gibson v. State (1912), 178 Ind. 315, 99 N. E. 424; Brown v. Dicus (1909), 172 Ind. 51, 54, 87 N. E. 716; State, ex rel. v. Boyd (1909), 172 Ind. 196, 87 N. E. 140; Hood v. McCarthy (1910), 174 Ind. 128, 91 N. E. 501; State, ex rel. v. Owens (1910), 174 Ind. 142, 91 N. E. 562.

Note. — Reported in 103 N. E. 97. See, also, 2 Cyc. 533, 535.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gary Amusement Co. v. Hirsth
198 N.E. 298 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1935)
Purcell v. Estate of Purcell
265 Ill. App. 540 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1932)
Bernard v. Kokomo Hotel Co.
176 N.E. 26 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1931)
Dempsey v. Chicago Coliseum Club
162 N.E. 237 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1928)
Holmes v. Negley
159 N.E. 694 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1928)
State ex rel. Bryant v. Jackson
137 N.E. 51 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1922)
Keller v. Rewers
127 N.E. 149 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1921)
Zeigler v. Knotts
115 N.E. 343 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1917)
Kieselbach v. Feuer
109 N.E. 842 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1915)
Howard v. Happell
103 N.E. 1065 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 N.E. 97, 180 Ind. 483, 1913 Ind. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-farmers-state-bank-ind-1913.