Meyer v. Doyle Chevrolet, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meyer v. Doyle Chevrolet, Inc.

234 A.D.2d 1016, 651 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13931

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 234 A.D.2d 1016 (Meyer v. Doyle Chevrolet, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer v. Doyle Chevrolet, Inc., 234 A.D.2d 1016, 651 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Motion to settle record on appeal and to consolidate appeals denied; motion to extend time to perfect appeal granted. Memorandum: A motion to settle the record on appeal should be addressed to the trial court. The remedy for an adverse determination of such a motion is an appeal from the order embodying the determination. The rules of this Court do not permit consolidation. However, multiple appeals may be combined into a single record, so long as the papers for each appeal are physically separated from those for the other appeals. No further extensions will be granted. Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ. (Filed Dec. 27,1996.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion to settle record on appeal and to consolidate appeals denied; motion to extend time to perfect appeal granted. Memorandum: A motion to settle the record on appeal should be addressed to the trial court. The remedy for an adverse determination of such a motion is an appeal from the order embodying the determination. The rules of this Court do not permit consolidation. However, multiple appeals may be combined into a single record, so long as the papers for each appeal are physically separated from those for the other appeals. No further extensions will be granted. Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ. (Filed Dec. 27,1996.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D.2d 1016, 651 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-doyle-chevrolet-inc-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack