Meyer v. County Court

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meyer v. County Court

37 A.D.2d 586, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3883

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 586 (Meyer v. County Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer v. County Court, 37 A.D.2d 586, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR with respect to a certain criminal case pending in the County Court, Suffolk County, in which petitioner, as defendant therein, is charged with murder in the first degree and kidnapping in the first degree. The relief sought is (1) to compel respondents to authorize an expenditure of $575 for the services of medical experts on petitioner’s behalf and (2) to prohibit [587]*587respondents from proceeding with the criminal case until authorization for such expenditure, which is claimed to be petitioner’s constitutional right, is given. Respondents have moved to dismiss the proceeding upon objections in point of law. Respondents’ motion granted; proceeding dismissed, without costs. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuseello, Latham, Shapiro and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR with respect to a certain criminal case pending in the County Court, Suffolk County, in which petitioner, as defendant therein, is charged with murder in the first degree and kidnapping in the first degree. The relief sought is (1) to compel respondents to authorize an expenditure of $575 for the services of medical experts on petitioner’s behalf and (2) to prohibit [587]*587respondents from proceeding with the criminal case until authorization for such expenditure, which is claimed to be petitioner’s constitutional right, is given. Respondents have moved to dismiss the proceeding upon objections in point of law. Respondents’ motion granted; proceeding dismissed, without costs. Munder, Acting P. J., Martuseello, Latham, Shapiro and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 586, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-county-court-nyappdiv-1971.