Meyer v. City of San Diego

53 P. 1128, 121 Cal. 113, 1898 Cal. LEXIS 859
California Supreme Court·Decided May 31, 1898·No. L. A. Nos. 333, 373·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

These are appeals in the consolidated action brought to enjoin the issuance of certain municipal bonds of the city of San Diego, and to annul a contract which had been entered into by the city with the Southern California Mountain Water Company, a corporation.

It has been this day decided in Albert Meyer et al. v. City of San Diego et al., ante, p. 102, that the trial judge was disqualified by interest, and that the motion made for a change of venue should have been granted. And the order denying a change of venue was therefore reversed.

It may be regretted that the expense and labor necessarily incurred in the preparation and presentation of these appeals should thus be wasted, but as, under the circumstances, the judgment rendered is of no force or validity, the questions cannot be considered upon their merits, and naught remains but to reverse the judgment.

The judgment and order are reversed and the cause remanded.

Behearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meyer v. City of San Diego, 53 P. 1128, 121 Cal. 113, 1898 Cal. LEXIS 859 (Cal. 1898).

53 P. 1128 (Meyer v. City of San Diego) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garess v. Tobin
261 S.W. 430 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1924)