Meyer v. Christiansen

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Meyer v. Christiansen

140 N.Y.S. 1131, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5499

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 7, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 140 N.Y.S. 1131 (Meyer v. Christiansen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer v. Christiansen, 140 N.Y.S. 1131, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

As no evidence was introduced which proved, or from which it can be inferred, that defendant Kragh authorized Porsth to bind him to pay the cost of the entire dinner, the complaint should have been dismissed, without prejudice to a new action at the close of plaintiff’s case, in response to the motion to that effect then made. The judgment is therefore modified accordingly, and,, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIJUR, J.

As no evidence was introduced which proved, or from which it can be inferred, that defendant Kragh authorized Porsth to bind him to pay the cost of the entire dinner, the complaint should have been dismissed, without prejudice to a new action at the close of plaintiff’s case, in response to the motion to that effect then made. The judgment is therefore modified accordingly, and,, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 N.Y.S. 1131, 1913 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-christiansen-nyappterm-1913.