Meyer v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.

117 N.W. 1037, 22 S.D. 377, 1908 S.D. LEXIS 87

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case appears to have been placed upon the October term calendar, 1907, and on the 26th day of October was submitted. It further appears frqm an examination of the clerk’s record that the original record in the action has never been filed, and that no abstract or briefs have been served or filed by either party.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution.

FULLER, J., taking no part in this decision.