Meyer v. Chas. Fisher & Sons Dental Laboratory, Inc.

90 A.D.2d 889, 456 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19158
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 90 A.D.2d 889 (Meyer v. Chas. Fisher & Sons Dental Laboratory, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyer v. Chas. Fisher & Sons Dental Laboratory, Inc., 90 A.D.2d 889, 456 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19158 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Kahn, J.), entered July 9, 1981 in Ulster County, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment. Plaintiff commenced this action against defendant by service of a summons and complaint on the Secretary of State, pursuant to section 306 of the Business Corporation Law. The Secretary of State mailed the summons and complaint to defendant at the address on file, but they were never received by defendant. When defendant failed to answer, plaintiff obtained a default judgment. Following receipt of the judgment, defendant moved to vacate the default pursuant to CPLR 317 or 5015 (subd [a]). Special Term denied the motion and this appeal ensued. Special Term’s order must be reversed. Pursuant to CPLR 317, a person served with a summons other than by personal delivery to him or to his agent for service designated under CPLR 318 (which the Secretary of State is not) can be relieved of a default upon a finding of the court that he did not personally receive notice of the summons in time to defend and that he has a meritorious defense (Cecelia v Colonial Sand & Stone Co., 85 AD2d 56). It is undisputed that defendant did not personally receive notice of the summons in time to defend, and the affidavit of defendant’s president establishes the existence of a meritorious defense. Plaintiff’s contention that defendant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for not filing a change of address with the Secretary of State is irrelevant, for while defendant’s failure to demonstrate such an excuse will preclude relief pursuant to CPLR 5015 (subd [a]), it will not preclude relief pursuant to CPLR 317 (Cecelia v Colonial Sand & Stone Co., supra, p 58). Vogel v Asgrow Mandeville Co. (74 AD2d 940, app dsmd 50 NY2d 894) is distinguishable, since the defendant therein failed to demonstrate a meritorious defense (Cecelia v Colonial Sand & Stone Co., supra). Order reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, defendant’s motion granted, and judgment entered January 20, 1981, vacated. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pena v. Mittleman
179 A.D.2d 607 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Paul Conte Cadillac, Inc. v. C.A.R.S. Purchasing Service, Inc.
126 A.D.2d 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Abrahams v. Peddlers Pond Holding Corp.
125 A.D.2d 355 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
In Re Cohoes Industrial Terminal, Inc.
62 B.R. 369 (S.D. New York, 1986)
Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A. C. Dutton Lumber Co.
492 N.E.2d 116 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Marquette Co. v. Norcem, Inc.
114 A.D.2d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Rifenburg v. Liffiton Homes, Inc.
107 A.D.2d 1015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Winters v. Albany Executive House Apartments, Inc.
102 A.D.2d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Union Indemnity Insurance v. 10-01 50th Avenue Realty Corp.
102 A.D.2d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Epstein v. Abalene Pest Control Service, Inc.
98 A.D.2d 832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Zuppa v. Bison Drywall & Insulation Co.
93 A.D.2d 997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 A.D.2d 889, 456 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-chas-fisher-sons-dental-laboratory-inc-nyappdiv-1982.