Meyer v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
103 A. 1053, 90 N.J.L. 694, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 405
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Minturn, Kaltsck. White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 7.
For reversal—The Ghiee Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Heppeniieimer, JJ. 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meyer v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 103 A. 1053, 90 N.J.L. 694, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 405 (N.J. 1917).
103 A. 1053 (Meyer v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hertz Washmobile System v. Village of South Orange
135 A.2d 524 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1957)