Meyer v. Basco
This text of Meyer v. Basco (Meyer v. Basco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 21-FEB-2023 07:52 AM SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX Dkt. 12 OGAC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ______________________________________________________________________________
KIEU MEYER, STEPHEN MEYER, KIEU MEYER ON BEHALF OF A MINOR, Respondents/Petitioners-Appellees,
vs.
JAMES BASCO and MARY BASCO, Petitioners/Respondents-Appellants. ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; Case No. 2DSS-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
The application for writ of certiorari filed on January 3, 2023, by Petitioners/Respondents-Appellants James and Mary Basco is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held, subject to further order of this court. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 21, 2023. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Meyer v. Basco, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-basco-haw-2023.