Meyer v. Alexandre
This text of 772 So. 2d 627 (Meyer v. Alexandre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant plaintiff was awarded attorney’s fees under the offer of judgment statute, section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1995), as a result of a verdict she obtained in an accident case. She has apparently been unable to collect the fees against the defendants and has filed a motion to join the defendant’s liability insurer, Illinois National Insurance Company as a party, in order to request a judgment for the attorney’s fees against the insurer. The trial court denied the motion to join the insurer, without prejudice to plaintiff seeking the fees in an action for bad faith against the insurer.1
Under similar circumstances, the Second District Court of Appeal concluded that the plaintiff could not recover attorney’s fees against a liability insurer, which was not a party, under the offer of judgment statute. Sparks v. Barnes, 755 So.2d 718 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We agree with the reasoning of Sparks and affirm. See also Feltzin v. Bernard, 719 So.2d 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
772 So. 2d 627, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16230, 2000 WL 1816627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-v-alexandre-fladistctapp-2000.