Meyer-Kiser Corp. v. Dooley

Supreme Court of Florida

Meyer-Kiser Corp. v. Dooley

129 So. 592, 100 Fla. 243

DecidedJuly 23, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 129 So. 592 (Meyer-Kiser Corp. v. Dooley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer-Kiser Corp. v. Dooley, 129 So. 592, 100 Fla. 243 (Fla. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per. Curiam.

— In an action of assumpsit on the common counts judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for services performed for the defendant. On writ of error taken by the defendant it appears that the verdict is not sustained by proof of compensation fixed by express contract or by sufficient evidence as to the reasonable value of services rendered. The motion for new trial should have. been granted.

Reversed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis and Brown, J. J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per. Curiam.

— In an action of assumpsit on the common counts judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for services performed for the defendant. On writ of error taken by the defendant it appears that the verdict is not sustained by proof of compensation fixed by express contract or by sufficient evidence as to the reasonable value of services rendered. The motion for new trial should have. been granted.

Reversed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis and Brown, J. J., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 So. 592, 100 Fla. 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-kiser-corp-v-dooley-fla-1930.