Meyer Hecht, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Meyer Hecht, Inc. v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 115, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 651

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 22, 1949

DocketNo. 53314; protest 119022-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 23 Cust. Ct. 115 (Meyer Hecht, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer Hecht, Inc. v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 115, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 651 (cusc 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts involved are the same in all material respects as those presented in Perry, Ryer & Company v. United States (35 C. C. P. A. 28, C. A. D. 367). The undisputed facts established that certain percentages of the merchandise consisted of skins of hybrid goats of common and Angora origin, dutiable at 32 cents per pound on a clean content of 25 percent, as assessed, the dutiable weights being the percentages as set forth in the stipulation. The remaining merchandise, consisting of skins of the common goat of the Argentine, was held free of duty under paragraph 1765 as raw skins, not specially provided for, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts involved are the same in all material respects as those presented in Perry, Ryer & Company v. United States (35 C. C. P. A. 28, C. A. D. 367). The undisputed facts established that certain percentages of the merchandise consisted of skins of hybrid goats of common and Angora origin, dutiable at 32 cents per pound on a clean content of 25 percent, as assessed, the dutiable weights being the percentages as set forth in the stipulation. The remaining merchandise, consisting of skins of the common goat of the Argentine, was held free of duty under paragraph 1765 as raw skins, not specially provided for, as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Cust. Ct. 115, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-hecht-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1949.