Meyer Harbor Property Owners Ass'n v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meyer Harbor Property Owners Ass'n v. State

50 A.D.2d 626, 375 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12435

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1975

DocketClaim No. 50909

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 626 (Meyer Harbor Property Owners Ass'n v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meyer Harbor Property Owners Ass'n v. State, 50 A.D.2d 626, 375 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12435 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims, entered April 4, 1972, which dismissed the claim. The claimant, an unincorporated association, premised the claim herein upon a contention that the State had "made a de facto appropriation of the bridges and walkways owned and utilized by the claimant and members thereof’. Among other things, the court below, after hearing proof, found that the claimant had failed to prove "that it had a right, title or interest in the property alleged to have been appropriated.” The record sustains that finding. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Koreman and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims, entered April 4, 1972, which dismissed the claim. The claimant, an unincorporated association, premised the claim herein upon a contention that the State had "made a de facto appropriation of the bridges and walkways owned and utilized by the claimant and members thereof’. Among other things, the court below, after hearing proof, found that the claimant had failed to prove "that it had a right, title or interest in the property alleged to have been appropriated.” The record sustains that finding. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Koreman and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 626, 375 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-harbor-property-owners-assn-v-state-nyappdiv-1975.