Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, PC

166 A.3d 1236, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 419
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 22, 2017
DocketNo. 397 WAL 2016; No. 398 WAL 2016
StatusPublished

This text of 166 A.3d 1236 (Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, PC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, P.L.L.C. v. Law Firm of Malone Middleman, PC, 166 A.3d 1236, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 419 (Pa. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2017, the Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in vacating the Judgment of the Court of Common Pleas with respect to Meyer Darragh’s quantum meruit claim when Meyer Darragh performed legal work and incurred expenses on behalf of the client and doing so would force Meyer Darragh to engage that client, who has already paid its legal fees in full, in litigation or allow Malone Middleman to be unjustly enriched.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A.3d 1236, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meyer-darragh-buckler-bebenek-eck-pllc-v-law-firm-of-malone-pa-2017.