Mewa v. State

875 So. 2d 795, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8917, 2004 WL 1413897
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 25, 2004
DocketNo. 5D03-1436
StatusPublished

This text of 875 So. 2d 795 (Mewa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mewa v. State, 875 So. 2d 795, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8917, 2004 WL 1413897 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Dormezil v. State, 754 So.2d 168, 170 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (“The defense counsel’s objection to the single, isolated comment by the prosecutor was not preserved because defense counsel declined the trial court’s offer to make a curative instruction”) (footnote omitted).

PETERSON, THOMPSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dormezil v. State
754 So. 2d 168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
875 So. 2d 795, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8917, 2004 WL 1413897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mewa-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.