Metzger v. United States
146 F. 132, 76 C.C.A. 558, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4091
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 26, 1906·No. No. 131·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
We are clearly of the opinion that the phrase “articles * * * composed * * * in part of * * * spangles made of * * * gelatin,” is more specific than the phrase “manufactures of gelatin,” and for that reason affirm the decision of the Circuit Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Metzger v. United States, 146 F. 132, 76 C.C.A. 558, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4091 (2d Cir. 1906).
146 F. 132 (Metzger v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
International Expediters, Inc. v. United States
28 Cust. Ct. 68 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)
Max B. Heim Corp. v. United States
28 Cust. Ct. 62 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)
International General Electric Co. v. United States
11 Cust. Ct. 137 (U.S. Customs Court, 1943)
Loewenthal v. United States
6 Ct. Cust. 209 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1915)
United States v. Guthman, Solomons & Co.
159 F. 273 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1907)