Metzger v. Metzger

622 N.E.2d 295, 82 N.Y.2d 735, 602 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 3173
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 7, 1993·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the movant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Metzger v. Metzger, 622 N.E.2d 295, 82 N.Y.2d 735, 602 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 3173 (N.Y. 1993).

622 N.E.2d 295 (Metzger v. Metzger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.