Metzger v. Kelly

34 App. D.C. 548, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5848
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 1, 1910
DocketNo. 2079
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 34 App. D.C. 548 (Metzger v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Metzger v. Kelly, 34 App. D.C. 548, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5848 (D.C. Cir. 1910).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Van Orsdel

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an appeal from an order of the supreme court of the District of Columbia sustaining appellees’ demurrer to appellant’s second amended petition in a proceeding for' an award [549]*549of damages for the condemnation of insanitary buildings in the District of Columbia. The order appealed from is as follows: “This cause coming on to he heard on demurrer to the second amended petition filed herein, and after argument by counsel and being considered by the court, it is, by the court, this 27th day of August, a. d. 1909, adjudged, ordered, and decreed that the said demurrer be and the same is hereby sustained. * * * From the foregoing decree, the complainant, in open court, notes an appeal to the court of appeals of the District of Columbia, and the bond for costs is hereby fixed in the sum of one hundred ($100) dollars.”

This is a mere interlocutory order, sustaining a demurrer. No final judgment was entered in the court below; hence, the appeal is fatally defective. The practice is so uniform that an appeal will not lie from such an order, that discussion or citation of authority is unnecessary. No objection on this point was made by counsel, but the court, on its own motion, will notice such a patent defect in the record, and govern it? action accordingly. The appeal is dismissed, with costs, and it is so ordered. Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Randle & Garvin, Inc.
32 A.2d 104 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 App. D.C. 548, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metzger-v-kelly-cadc-1910.