Metzger v. Couper
This text of 21 A.D.2d 920 (Metzger v. Couper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, seeking a review of the determination of the Board of Regents. The parts of the motion picture, directed by the Board of Regents to be eliminated as “ obscene. ”, in our opinion do not constitute an appeal to prurient interest in violation of the statute. (Matter of Excelsior Pictures Corp. v. Regents, 3 N Y 2d 237, 242; Kingsley Pictures Corp. v. Regents, 360 U. S. 684.) Determination annulled, and matter remitted with the direction to license the film, with $50 costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 A.D.2d 920, 252 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metzger-v-couper-nyappdiv-1964.