Metzger v. Childs

1 Cal. Unrep. 875
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 29, 1874
DocketNo. 3945
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 875 (Metzger v. Childs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Metzger v. Childs, 1 Cal. Unrep. 875 (Cal. 1874).

Opinion

McKINSTRY, J.

— The contract, so far as it authorized the purchase of the outstanding claims against the plaintiffs, was executed by the defendants. No creditor of the plaintiffs is interested in the result of this controversy, and no principle of .public policy required the court below to dismiss the action.

The contract alleged was an entire contract, and proof of the fact that the defendants surrendered the possession of the sheep, which constituted their security, before a full compliance with their promise to buy up the outstanding indebtedness, was not a material variance from the terms of the contract alleged.

Judgment affirmed.

We concur: Niles, J.; Rhodes, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cal. Unrep. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metzger-v-childs-cal-1874.