Metz v. Romero
106 P. 344, 15 N.M. 273
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT.
The facts and legal questions involved in this case are practically the same as those in case No. 1249 (Joseph C. Baldridge, v. A. J. Morgan, et al.) and it was agreed that the opinion filed in the foregoing case should be decisive of each case.
The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Metz v. Romero, 106 P. 344, 15 N.M. 273 (N.M. 1910).
106 P. 344 (Metz v. Romero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Lindsey
New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2010