Metz v. Romero
106 P. 344, 15 N.M. 273
This text of 106 P. 344 (Metz v. Romero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Metz v. Romero, 106 P. 344, 15 N.M. 273 (N.M. 1910).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT.
The facts and legal questions involved in this case are practically the same as those in case No. 1249 (Joseph C. Baldridge, v. A. J. Morgan, et al.) and it was agreed that the opinion filed in the foregoing case should be decisive of each case.
The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Lindsey
New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2010
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
106 P. 344, 15 N.M. 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metz-v-romero-nm-1910.