Metz v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
ANDREA METZ,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No.: 2:20-cv-966-KCD
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant. / ORDER Having obtained an award of benefits, Andrea Metz’s attorney, Michael A. Steinberg, seeks attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Doc. 32.) Defendant has not opposed the request. Section 406(b) provides that an attorney who obtains a benefits award on remand may petition for a reasonable fee—not to exceed twenty-five percent of the claimant’s past-due benefits—for work performed before the court. Here, Steinberg requests $13,768.98, which is 25 percent of past-due benefits. Steinberg further asserts that the previous EAJA award of $3,598.12 will be returned to Plaintiff. (Doc. 32 at 3); see Paltan v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 519 F. App’x 673, 674 (11th Cir. 2013) (noting that the attorney has the option of either refunding a prior EAJA award to the plaintiff directly or reducing the § 406(b) award by the same amount). For the reasons stated in Metz’s unopposed motion, the requested fee 1s both reasonable and appropriate under § 406(b). Accordingly, the unopposed fee motion (Doc. 32) is GRANTED. The clerk will enter judgment for Metz for $18,768.98 in attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on April 22, 2024.
LF ff fe yt 6. Haslet” * Keéle C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge
Copies: All Parties of Record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Metz v. Commissioner of Social Security (Metz v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.