Metz v. City of Macon
This text of 89 S.E. 303 (Metz v. City of Macon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The point, made in the brief of counsel for plaintiS in error, that there was no proof of the venue of the alleged crime can not be considered by this court, as no distinct allegation of failure to prove the venue was made in the petition for certiorari, and the point was not specifically raised either in the trial court (the recorder’s court of the city of Macon) or in the superior court. Acts 1911, p. 149; Park’s Penal Code, § 792 (a); Marshman v. State, 138 Ga. 864 (76 S. E. 562).
2. The judgment of the recorder was authorized by the evidence, and the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 S.E. 303, 18 Ga. App. 289, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metz-v-city-of-macon-gactapp-1916.