Metz v. American Credit Indemnity Co.
34 N.Y.S. 1144, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 619, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 876
This text of 34 N.Y.S. 1144 (Metz v. American Credit Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Metz v. American Credit Indemnity Co., 34 N.Y.S. 1144, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 619, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 876 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
Under the contract by which Abraham was employed by the defendant, he had no authority to bind the defendant to pay commissions to the plaintiff; and, besides, there is no evidence that Abraham assumed to bind the defendant. The motion for new trial should be denied, and judgment, ordered dismissing the complaint, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 N.Y.S. 1144, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 619, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metz-v-american-credit-indemnity-co-nysupct-1895.