Metz v. Abney

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Metz v. Abney

65 S.C. 576

DecidedJuly 1, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 65 S.C. 576 (Metz v. Abney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metz v. Abney, 65 S.C. 576 (S.C. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by Levi Metz against B. L. Abney, Jno. P. Thomas, Jr., and J. S. Verner. This is the same case reported in 64 S. C., 254, wherein a new trial was ordered. The case thereupon came up on its merits and the jury rendered a verdict for the ‘defendants. The plaintiff served notice of appeal, but failed to prosecute the same, and on motion of R. W. Shand, for defendants, and W. H. Lyles, for plaintiff, consenting, the appeal was dismissed by the clerk of this Court by order dated April 11,1903.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by Levi Metz against B. L. Abney, Jno. P. Thomas, Jr., and J. S. Verner. This is the same case reported in 64 S. C., 254, wherein a new trial was ordered. The case thereupon came up on its merits and the jury rendered a verdict for the ‘defendants. The plaintiff served notice of appeal, but failed to prosecute the same, and on motion of R. W. Shand, for defendants, and W. H. Lyles, for plaintiff, consenting, the appeal was dismissed by the clerk of this Court by order dated April 11,1903.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 S.C. 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metz-v-abney-sc-1903.