Metz & Co. v. United States

Customs and Patent Appeals

Metz & Co. v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 570, 1925 WL 29430, 1925 CCPA LEXIS 39

CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals

DecidedMarch 30, 1925

DocketNo. 2517

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Ct. Cust. 570 (Metz & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metz & Co. v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. 570, 1925 WL 29430, 1925 CCPA LEXIS 39 (ccpa 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cueiam:

Appellants, H. A. Metz & Co., appeal from the decision of the Board of General Appraisers in reappraisement.

In this court on the 23d of March, 1925, appellants moved the court for an order reversing the decision of the Board of General Appraisers and remanding the case to said board to enable it to make its findings of facts and to state its conclusions of law, and for an order deferring the printing of the record in the cause until decision upon the motion. The motion is denied.

The record of this case has not been printed, nor are the briefs before us. From an examination of the papers in the case we are not at this time impressed with the necessity of any further findings of facts and conclusions of law. The filing of the motion and our action on the same herein will not be regarded as interfering with the court’s right to later remand the case, in the event, upon a closer examination of the issues, it finds it necessary to do so.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cueiam:

Appellants, H. A. Metz & Co., appeal from the decision of the Board of General Appraisers in reappraisement.

In this court on the 23d of March, 1925, appellants moved the court for an order reversing the decision of the Board of General Appraisers and remanding the case to said board to enable it to make its findings of facts and to state its conclusions of law, and for an order deferring the printing of the record in the cause until decision upon the motion. The motion is denied.

The record of this case has not been printed, nor are the briefs before us. From an examination of the papers in the case we are not at this time impressed with the necessity of any further findings of facts and conclusions of law. The filing of the motion and our action on the same herein will not be regarded as interfering with the court’s right to later remand the case, in the event, upon a closer examination of the issues, it finds it necessary to do so.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Ct. Cust. 570, 1925 WL 29430, 1925 CCPA LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metz-co-v-united-states-ccpa-1925.