Metts v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided July 27, 2018·No. 18-1089·Unpublished

Opinion

ORIGINAL 3Jn tbe Wniteb $tates

************************************ * CASSANDRA METTS, et al. * * Plaintiff, * FILED * v. * JUL 27 2018 * THE UNITED ST ATES, * U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS * Defendant. * * *************************************

ORDER

Plaintiffs, proceedingpro se, filed their complaint in this Court on July 17, 2018, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis ("App. IFP"). Plaintiffs seek "relief from the comts to remove firearms and illegal mental state assault" in violation of two Maryland criminal statutes. Pl. 's Compl. at A-6; App. IFP at A-7. Because this Comt does not have jurisdiction over criminal matters, this case must be dismissed. See Joshua v. United States, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3020 at *3 (Fed. Cir. 1994). The Clerk of the Comt is directed to DISMISS Plaintiffs' complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs' request to proceed in forma pauperis is moot and therefore DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

~-~~ EDWARDJ.DAMICH Senior Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Metts v. United States, (uscfc 2018).

Metts v. United States (Metts v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on Motion
17 F.3d 378 (Federal Circuit, 1994)